The shape of the work, made explicit
From approved requirements, skaftorAI generates a blueprint: the services involved, the data that moves between them, the interfaces that change, and the boundaries the work must respect. It is the architecture conversation, drafted — so review starts from something concrete.
- Services, data models, and interfaces mapped from intent
- New components distinguished from changes to existing ones
- Boundaries and dependencies made visible up front
Reviewable, not a black box
A blueprint is meant to be argued with. Engineers and architects annotate it, push back, and revise before it becomes work — so the design decisions happen in the open and the trade-offs are recorded alongside the choice.
- Annotate and revise the blueprint in review
- Trade-offs and decisions captured next to the design
- Approval required before a blueprint becomes work orders
Aware of the system, not just the ticket
Because blueprints are drafted against repo intelligence and organizational memory, they reflect how your services actually connect today — flagging when a proposed change touches a shared boundary or duplicates something that already exists.